Use text-based Grok to investigate a question, examine arguments, and prepare an answer with search context. Specify a period and a concrete question rather than asking for everything. Grok Imagine video is a separate mode with different results and ratings.
This comparison covers capabilities integrated into Neiron. The table does not declare a winner: choose by your source material and task constraints.
See the model page for modes and limitations. Unverified numerical limits are not listed here.
Check facts against sources and code changes with tests. DeepSeek web search is not enabled in Neiron.
DeepSeek reports native vision for V4.1 Flash. Neiron photo analysis still uses a separate route; direct vision mode for this version is not enabled here.
How to check your own task
Write down your requirements and check each output against them. Do not confuse a model difference with different prompts, resolutions, or inputs. The examples below are test briefs, not results of tests we have run.
Analyze this text: “A new service halved costs for all customers. The company surveyed 30 users and did not disclose its method.” Separate reported facts, promotional generalizations and methodological questions. Do not invent research or missing numbers.
Create a 30-minute meeting agenda from these notes: the site is ready, the form sometimes fails; ad copy is approved; budget is not approved; launch is wanted on Friday. Include timing and decisions to make. Do not assign people whose names are not given.
Check this calculation: 18 boxes of 12 bottles each; 47 bottles were sold. How many full boxes and loose bottles remain? Show the starting count, subtraction and a reverse-addition check. Do not round the remainder to a full box.
Questions about choosing
Are Grok and Grok Imagine the same model?
No. This card leads to a text chat. Grok Imagine in the video section produces a different kind of output.
How should I verify a recent-information answer?
Check the event date, publication date, and primary source. A paraphrase of a page is not independent corroboration of that page.
Should I ask the model to pick a winner in a debate?
It is more useful to define criteria: which facts are supported, which assumptions differ, and what would change the conclusion.